XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
    234 Posts 50 Posters 44.0k Views 40 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J Offline
      jr-m4 @olivierlambert
      last edited by

      @olivierlambert said:

      Ah sorry I read it too quickly. This panel is only there in some occasions, but I see the point of only displaying it when we click on a relevant element. Feedback for you @julienxovates

      While on the topic of the tree-view panel.
      Have you noticed that the indentation changes if there is a chevron indicating that there are VMs on a host? Making it so that the hosts no longer are alinged vertically
      6de7d690-7da3-4471-ba4a-e7ff4bf5b152-image.jpeg

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • julienXOvatesJ Offline
        julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team
        last edited by

        @jr-m4 Thank you for this feedback. We'll try to make it better based on this !

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • N Offline
          nasheayahu
          last edited by

          Afternoon, my session timed out and I do get the normal login page, but when I login I get this UiAlert Message:

          Screenshot From 2026-05-28 12-51-11.png

          import{B as e,C as t,St as n,U as r,X as i,_ as a,g as o,h as s,m as c,t as l,x as u,xt as d}from"./_plugin-vue_export-helper-DqPMJZfB.js";import{n as f,t as p}from"./VtsIcon-BoVekVkM.js";import{t as m}from"./use-mapper-M_HHKN3j.js";import{t as h}from"./UiButtonIcon-Df9Z1TJo.js";var g={class:`content`},_={class:`alert typo-body-regular-small`},v={key:0},y=l(t({__name:`UiAlert`,props:{accent:{},close:{type:Boolean}},emits:[`close`],setup(t,{emit:l}){let y=l,b=i(),x=m(()=>t.accent,{info:`status:info-circle`,success:`status:success-circle`,warning:`status:warning-circle`,danger:`status:danger-circle`},`info`);return(i,l)=>(e(),a(`div`,{class:n([d(f)({accent:t.accent}),`ui-alert`])},[c(`div`,g,[u(p,{class:`information-icon`,name:d(x),size:`current`},null,8,[`name`]),c(`div`,_,[c(`div`,null,[r(i.$slots,`default`,{},void 0,!0)]),b.description?(e(),a(`div`,v,[r(i.$slots,`description`,{},void 0,!0)])):o(``,!0)]),t.close?(e(),s(h,{key:0,class:`close-button`,icon:`fa:xmark`,accent:`brand`,size:`small`,onClick:l[0]||=e=>y(`close`)})):o(``,!0)])],2))}}),[[`__scopeId`,`data-v-5b9f5cdd`]]);export{y as t};
          

          ... and after back-paging, I was able to login normally.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • julienXOvatesJ Offline
            julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @escape222
            last edited by

            @escape222 said:

            Slow booting on Debian 13 VM created from a template

            I recently tried cloning a VM from a template (created from a full install of Debian 13). What was noticed was that the system takes forever to boot when the VM is created from XO-6. The issue does not happen in XO-5. The VM seems to hang at the TianoCore boot screen Hang.png.

            What I noticed is that when the VM is cloned with XO-6 the boot order somehow changes to Network boot as the first option

            BootOrder.png

            This does not happen (change of boot order) if the VM is cloned from XO-5 and there is no boot delay. The boot process seems to wait for more than 2 minutes before it fails network boot and then proceeds normally to boot from the Hard drive
            Hang2.png

            Thanks

            Hi @escape222,
            For info boot order issue has been resolved in XO 6.5 !

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • julienXOvatesJ Offline
              julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @ph7
              last edited by

              @ph7 said:

              Xen Orchestra, commit 71fa8
              With a snapshot attached to a VM, it is reported to use 0% of 100GB
              7fecc14f-bea7-4acb-b5eb-9e2f3c0ac8e6-image.png

              And if I remove the snaphot
              e25ffd4b-796a-47a5-ae21-c2252d2ffc96-image.png

              And that seems to be more accurate

              Hi @ph7,
              The VDI storage used space with snapshots has been fixed in XO 6.5 !

              P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • P Offline
                ph7 @julienXOvates
                last edited by

                @julienXOvates
                Well not in my daefc witch is newer than 6.5.1
                d2391283-67c1-4c60-9fc1-7f90f6f1f7eb-image.jpeg

                b37742ca-add5-4579-b990-28e0dbca8be5-image.jpeg

                ph@romy:~$ df -h
                Filsystem      Storlek Använt Ledigt Anv% Monterat på
                udev              1,9G      0   1,9G   0% /dev
                tmpfs             392M   916K   391M   1% /run
                /dev/xvda2         93G   6,3G    82G   8% /
                tmpfs             2,0G      0   2,0G   0% /dev/shm
                efivarfs          128K    52K    72K  42% /sys/firmware/efi/efivars
                tmpfs             5,0M      0   5,0M   0% /run/lock
                tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/systemd-journald.service
                tmpfs             2,0G   4,0K   2,0G   1% /tmp
                /dev/xvda1        975M   8,8M   966M   1% /boot/efi
                tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/getty@tty1.service
                tmpfs             1,0M      0   1,0M   0% /run/credentials/serial-getty@hvc0.service
                tmpfs             392M    68K   392M   1% /run/user/105
                tmpfs             392M    68K   392M   1% /run/user/1000
                

                seems more like 8% to me

                P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • P Offline
                  ph7 @ph7
                  last edited by

                  same in my XOA 6.5.1

                  julienXOvatesJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • julienXOvatesJ Offline
                    julienXOvates Vates 🪐 XO Team @ph7
                    last edited by

                    OK, we'll have another look at it, sorry for this !

                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P Offline
                      ph7 @julienXOvates
                      last edited by

                      @julienXOvates
                      The faulty ones are on local SR
                      If I take a manual snapshot on a NFS VM, I see the correct value

                      Will test a scheduled one

                      P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • P Offline
                        ph7 @ph7
                        last edited by

                        Local VMs vith scheduled Incremental Backup and CR are affected
                        NFS VMs vith scheduled Incremental Backup are affected
                        NFS VMs with CR not affected

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post