@dinhngtu Thanks for fixing the note. The IP loss did happen on 9.6.0. On the first boot after I set has-vendor-device=false, the guest still reported tools 9.6.0 build 19 (xenbus 9.1.13.23, xenvif 9.1.15.8, xennet 9.1.8.6), and both static IPs were already gone: the main NIC was on DHCP and the second NIC had a 169.254 address. XenClean and the 9.2.385 install came after that.

@poddingue Acctually my experience is that a VDI with CBT enabled can't have its VDI migrated at all. And XO does indeed catch that CBT is enabled. But it doesn't disable it -> migrate -> re-enable. @archw And if you'd like to migrate VDIs between SRs you'd most likely also have to delete existing snapshots as well (along with disabling CBT prior to migrating).

Just discussed this with @nathanael-h; I would strongly recommend using the load balancer plugin in XO and create some VM-to-host affinity rules, so that your CP VMs are running on different hosts ! So when the RPU comes you would have minimum impact.

Any news about issue?

@willamcorlin Hello, The fix for CVE-2026-46243 has gone through the entire standard release process, which includes: Review by at least 2 developers. Unit testing within the package (if available). End-to-end testing in the CI (xcp-ng-tests). Several days of user testing. And since the release, we have received no feedback suggesting any potential regression. (This does not mean that the risk of a regression is zero.) If any issue arises, please do not hesitate to get back to us. Respectfully,