@nikade yeah that's hot but would need explaining it as if it were for a 5 years old... asking for a friend :') did they overcome a bottleneck in VDI between SR copy ?

@olivierlambert said: I have no issue using Claude, but I would prefer your own conclusions/recommendations in the end and less text Sory its early morning. I wanted to show the statement what it said about what was missing on Vates side along what was missing from my script. Also to verify if Claude was correct or not. I have been battle with that alot lately.

I am not sure if it is the same issue or not. I doing daily replication from: 4 VMs nvme-1 SR vhd --> nvme-2 SR qcow2 2 VMs nvme-2 SR qcow2 --> nvme-1 SR vhd That is homelab for testing only. Xen Orchestra, commit 6a441 [image: 1788116186019-fd87b54f-fe95-449b-8f7e-17c1da61a4cd-image.jpeg] Standalone "Host up-to-date!" with latest august updates. Replication qcow2 --> vhd works as expected. Replication of vhd --> qcow2 creates daily new replica VM and reports this: [image: 1788116670461-b6ae1b45-0735-44b8-b490-c4f89ba3f953-image.jpeg] Log: 2026-08-30T18_42_49.945Z - backup NG.json.txt