1. Home
  2. Popular
Log in to post
  • J

    [Bug?] SR_SOURCE_SPACE_INSUFFICIENT - Problems enabling HA

    Unsolved XCP-ng
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    69 Views
    ronan-aR
    @jr-m4 Hello, can you share your xensource.log file after using enable_ha call?
  • stormiS

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Pinned News
    541
    1 Votes
    541 Posts
    244k Views
    P
    @dthenot said: @probain Hello, It's likely linked to the List index out of range bug. That bug was linked to the SR scan failing to introduce CBT_metatadata VDI in the XAPI database, could you try to launch a xe sr-scan uuid=<SR UUID> and try again to disable CBT? If it does not work, could you share the /var/log/SMlog of around the time you are trying to disable CBT? I've sent you a DM for sharing the logs.. Unfortunately I "solved" the issue by deleting all snapshots related to each VM. Including CBT ones. That did make it so I could toggle CBT on the VDIs again. But I've collected the logs for you. This also seems like a good time to raise my suggestion to have somewhere at vates where we could upload details in a similar way to how TrueNAS does it. Suggested here: https://feedback.vates.tech/posts/69/suggesting-to-add-a-debug-file-option
  • dcabaleD

    Several errors on boot

    Unsolved Hardware
    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    60 Views
    olivierlambertO
    For what I know, but maybe @teddyastie could confirm: Nothing. Typical of consumer grade hardware with buggy BIOS. Not I'm aware of No because it's a classical thing for consumer grade hardware. If you want zero message go for Dell servers. Even HPE server got sometimes buggy ACPI or stuff like that, but it's often patched during the life of the product. Consumer grade manufacturer simply don't care. Get server grade hardware or convince Asus to get their shit done correctly. Good luck on the latter (sadly).
  • johnnezeroJ

    Server Admin Guide: A Tale of Two Servers: BIOS, GPU, and NUMA Tuning for XCP-ng: Preserving the valuable work done by Tobias Kreidl (@tjkreidl)

    Hardware
    13
    2 Votes
    13 Posts
    442 Views
    poddingueP
    @tjkreidl My pleasure.
  • acebmxerA

    Some dashboard loading issues with v6

    Xen Orchestra
    24
    5
    0 Votes
    24 Posts
    699 Views
    acebmxerA
    @MathieuRA said: @acebmxer Hi i am able to reproduce the dashboard issue locally now, so we can also investigate on our end. Can you confirm, no dashboard issue on the commit : ee53cd072304a38e8bf816dceef9bc7277b776dc? Current commit running - Master 5811d Current available - Master a9f85 Should i update to the latest or do you have a specific build/branch to try?
  • T

    Continuous Replication Speed

    Backup
    2
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    47 Views
    P
    @tsukraw I think the bottleneck is indeed the tapdisk and smapiv1. We have full 10Gb WDM between nominal and DR site, and get the same transfer speeds as you on CR. [image: 1779779566351-c860aa15-c649-4608-91f9-0cec88645218-image.jpeg]
  • acebmxerA

    XOA - Memory Usage

    Xen Orchestra
    46
    2
    0 Votes
    46 Posts
    3k Views
    acebmxerA
    Memory issue is back.... [image: 1779812171753-screenshot-2026-05-26-121509.png]
  • laszlobortelL

    V2V migration disk transfer speed

    Advanced features v2v migration disk transfer speed
    3
    1 Votes
    3 Posts
    98 Views
    florentF
    @laszlobortel since we are generating the stream sequentially, we though that there wasn't any real world gain. Also, if my understanding is correct using one thread means we will have only one process( + xo + nbdkit-vddk) processes , and we were trying to limit the risk of zombie process locking the disks , which was far too common with the previous code we'll do a quick test to ensure it does not beak anything and propose either a better default of a configuration option note that this will be a concurrency per disk, so VM with a lot of disk will put more pressure on the source
  • G

    Alternative to XCP-NG Plugin for Veeam Backup & Replication Public BETA

    Unsolved Backup
    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    335 Views
    T
    When speaking to our Veeam sources, we were told end of July is the target date for 13.1. That is what we are hoping for as Veeam is an important one for us.