XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      634
      1 Votes
      634 Posts
      503k Views
      gduperreyG
      Hello, We have just made "refreshed" XCP-ng installation ISOs available for everyone; these include all updates released over the past year, up to the present day. You can read the blog post here: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2026/08/14/xcp-ng-8-3-lts-refreshed-installation-isos/
    • D

      Smart Reboot blocked in XO, and no Rolling Pool Update

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved XCP-ng
      6
      0 Votes
      6 Posts
      165 Views
      poddingueP
      Then, my earlier suggestion about upgrading was wrong, sorry, better to say so before you spend an evening on it. I went and read the RPU code (it's about time!): shutdownPinnedVms only handles VM_HAS_PCI_ATTACHED, VM_HAS_VGPU and VM_HAS_SRIOV_VIF, and when anything else turns up, it hands back to XAPI's CANNOT_EVACUATE_HOST on purpose. VM_REQUIRES_SR is not in that list, so an upgrade will not move you past it. On the Rolling Pool Update side, the docs say all VM disks have to be on shared storage (https://docs.xcp-ng.org/management/updates), and the host reboot guide defines an agile VM as one not tied to local storage or local devices (https://docs.xcp-ng.org/guides/host-reboot). With everything on local NVMe, that reads to me like RPU is closed to you by design rather than by bug. The route the docs give for your case is the manual one: disable the host, shut the VMs down or migrate them, then reboot. The Smart Reboot message looks like a separate problem. In XO's smartReboot a VM counts as suspend blocked in two different cases, either when blocked_operations.suspend is set, or when XAPI itself refuses VM.assert_operation_valid for suspend. The message only describes the first, which might be why clearing the protection changed nothing. These two will show which one you are in: xe vm-list is-control-domain=false params=name-label,blocked-operations xe vm-list is-control-domain=false power-state=running params=name-label,allowed-operations If suspend is missing from allowed-operations, then XAPI is refusing it rather than a flag you set. I ran both on 8.3, so I know they print something per VM. I have not tested any of this on a two-host pool, though, so the VM_REQUIRES_SR part is my reading of the code rather than something I reproduced.
    • A

      Backup fails with "Body Timeout Error", "all targets have failed, step: writer.run()"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Backup
      91
      0 Votes
      91 Posts
      9k Views
      olivierlambertO
      Excellent so it was an undici bug after all… Now I'm making sure @Team-XO-Backend won't miss it
    • T

      Openmetrics plugin changing Prometheus secret after every xo-server restart

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Advanced features
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      52 Views
      olivierlambertO
      Question for @Team-XO-Backend
    • R

      Date format on web interface: Only US format available?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Compute
      9
      2 Votes
      9 Posts
      967 Views
      A
      Any update on this? It is a drawback. It is also in the wrong format under snapshots. XO 5 has the format: July 17, 2026 or 2026-07-17 depending on the screen.