XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • A

      Backup fails with "Body Timeout Error", "all targets have failed, step: writer.run()"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Backup
      111
      0 Votes
      111 Posts
      15k Views
      P
      @JB @christopher-petzel Thanks for your patience! We are glad it works well!
    • G

      GPU Passthrough

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Management
      22
      3
      0 Votes
      22 Posts
      7k Views
      C
      @gskger Understood.. Thanks for clarifying @gskger
    • olivierlambertO

      🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      264
      7 Votes
      264 Posts
      120k Views
      C
      And sadly...the documentation for GPU passthrough states currently, due to proprietary code in Xenserver (blah!), NVIDIA is not (yet) supported
    • D

      Ubuntu cloud images on XCP-ng 8.3 UEFI: ~15s per secondary vCPU at boot, caused by console=ttyS0

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved Compute uefi cloud-init slow-boot ubuntu
      10
      0 Votes
      10 Posts
      496 Views
      poddingueP
      Thanks for the feedback, @dvinni !
    • D

      `/run/sr-mount` parent directory created 0700 on some hosts, 0755 on others

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      48 Views
      dthenotD
      @Dan Hello, I can't answer from memory, we'll take a look at this and come back to you Thanks for the report, I guess it could be considered a bug since even it's one of the other, it's not the expected behaviour to have the mode change between runs.
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      680
      1 Votes
      680 Posts
      618k Views
      B
      @gduperrey Installed on all pools. No issues so far.
    • A

      Broadcom removed public access to VDDK download links

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Migrate to XCP-ng
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      188 Views
      poddingueP
      We are fully aware of Broadcom's decision to stop providing the VDDK library to the cloud community or to reserve its download to some authorized partners and customers. As much as we regret this decision, we have to respect it. Because it impacts users who need to make backups, we are evaluating alternative options to address this situation. We will provide further guidance as this evaluation progresses but can't share more information for now.
    • C

      Bringing container visibility back to XO

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      8
      1
      0 Votes
      8 Posts
      478 Views
      nathanael-hN
      Hello there, Thanks a lot for raising the question and offering ideas to move forward @caps ! I would like to say that I really like the AI crafted screenshot provided 🤩 But, to be clear, the status as of today regarding Docker or other containers integration in XO/XCP-ng is that there is an item in the DevOps Tools team roadmap. The item is just to look and define what could be done (example update xscontainer, do something totally new, ...). Unfortunately this spike has a low priority and is not yet scheduled. That being said, there is an active project, which is close to what you're asking. It's about a better integration of Kubernetes, including, cluster update, adding nodes, etc. More on this should come in the next months! ️ Also note that I am chatting with different people and teams in Vates about this thread and the Docker integration topic to see if we could do something. Also last thing is that, the community is always welcome to build on top of our open source softwares. I am pretty sure that if someone would contribute a Xen Orchestra plugin to integrate Docker we would welcome this, and we could give tips and guidance. Like @teddyastie said, I'm not sure having Docker, Podman, related features in the guest agent would be something our colleagues would merge. But maybe the docker daemon socket could be kind of shared between VMs (I'm not sure at all this is possible and if possible how to do it). In the meantime exposing the docker daemon over network (with restrictions) to Xen Orchestra would be quick'n easy and I think safe enough if done carefully.