XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • D

      Ubuntu cloud images on XCP-ng 8.3 UEFI: ~15s per secondary vCPU at boot, caused by console=ttyS0

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Compute uefi cloud-init slow-boot ubuntu
      8
      0 Votes
      8 Posts
      119 Views
      D
      @poddingue Thanks for running the -31 numbers — good to have it confirmed that the ttyS0 removal stays worth ~3-4s even with the clock fixed. Agreed on not rushing -proposed to production; we'll pick up -31 when it promotes and keep the cloud-init tweak permanently.
    • olivierlambertO

      🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      249
      7 Votes
      249 Posts
      101k Views
      poddingueP
      Depends which one you mean, because there are two different problems tangled together in this stretch of the thread and they have opposite answers. If you mean @escape222's report at #177, where a VM cloned from XO 6 sits at the TianoCore screen for a couple of minutes, then yes, that was an XO bug and it is fixed. PR #9867, merged 26 May, shipped in XO 6.5.0 on 28 May. The boot order was being rewritten whenever no new disk needed provisioning, so an HVM VM created from a template that already had a disk got network pushed to the front whether or not anyone asked for a network install, and the VM burned the PXE timeout before falling through to the disk. It now follows the install method only. Since you are on sources, anything past 6.5.0 has it. If you mean the slow UEFI boot @MajorP93 described at #182, with the installing Xen timer and spinlock lines, that one is not an XO bug and no XO patch will touch it. It is a regression in the Linux guest kernel introduced in 6.12.5. The cost lands per secondary vCPU, so the wider the VM, the worse it looks. There is a separate thread with the per-vCPU numbers: Ubuntu cloud images on XCP-ng 8.3 UEFI. Worth noting its title blames console=ttyS0, which we now think amplifies the same bug rather than being a second one. I measured that one here this week on a single host, changing only the guest kernel between runs and leaving everything else alone. Ubuntu 7.0.0-30 came in at 50 and 59 seconds across two runs. 7.0.0-31 came in at 0.4. Wall clock reboot to sshd went from 78 seconds to 31. The awkward part is the timing. The upstream fix is f24df84cbe05, in stable 6.12.97 and later, 6.18.y, 7.1.4 and later, and 7.2, but no default channel carries it yet. I re-checked the archives this evening: Debian trixie still ships 6.12.94-1, with 6.12.100-1 sitting in proposed-updates for the next point release, and Ubuntu 26.04 still ships 7.0.0-30 in updates, published today, while 7.0.0-31 has been in proposed since 10 August. Rocky and el10 I could not confirm either way. So keep whatever workaround you are on until a named version lands for your distro. There is arguably a third one at #183, where @Greg_E had Debian 13 and Windows Server 2022 refusing to boot at all when created through XO-lite with UEFI. As far as I know nobody has retested that since. If it is the kernel one you are hitting, this says which version you are waiting for: uname -r dmesg -T | grep -iE "installing Xen timer|spinlock event"
    • henri9813H

      Slow boot on rocky linux 10 latest kernel

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Compute
      28
      2
      0 Votes
      28 Posts
      3k Views
      acebmxerA
      @poddingue I haven't seen this issue since we last discussed it back in June. Also looking back at the older comments its seems those where having issues were on AMD systems. I have migrated off AMD in my home lab. Work was always Intel.
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      653
      1 Votes
      653 Posts
      519k Views
      A
      @gduperrey Rolling pool update worked with released production patches.
    • F

      i915 pass-through and Linux Mint - xcp-ng 8.3

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      1
      0 Votes
      1 Posts
      9 Views
      No one has replied
    • msupportM

      Veeam 13.1 Rocky9 Linux Appliance: Potential Data Loss with CBT and Workers with Expired Tokens

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Backup
      10
      2 Votes
      10 Posts
      508 Views
      acebmxerA
      @msupport - Looks like veeam is still working with your on your issues. While veeam has pushed me off to vates / xen. @poddingue - Any updates from Vates about these issues? Is it possible the least patches just pushed might help with either mine or @msupport's issue? Update - Just got a reply back from veeam ... As per internal testing, I’m escalation this to the next tier Regards
    • E

      After Update XO wont start

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      6
      1
      1 Votes
      6 Posts
      690 Views
      D
      Hey that sucks after catching up 23 commits. Looks like something broke in the log module during the update. I’d try a clean reinstall of the dependencies first, or drop back to an older Node version for a bit – Node 24 can be fussy with these packages.
    • B

      Update Templates

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      14
      1 Votes
      14 Posts
      3k Views
      D
      Hi bikemuch, For unregistered XOA the template auto-update is limited. Easiest way is via CLI: download the latest Debian 13 and CentOS Stream 10 ISOs, then use xe vm-import or create new templates from them. You can also check the XOA “Templates” section and force a refresh if available. Works fine for me this way.
    • K

      Tesla xenctrlext.unix_error Device or resource is busy

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Hardware
      13
      2
      0 Votes
      13 Posts
      2k Views
      poddingueP
      @seanmcg182 's post might be the answer to the original question, two years late. Your lspci -s 0000:05:00.0 -v at post 8 shows (rev ff) and !!! Unknown header type 7f, which is the same pair he had, and in his case it came from bifurcating the wrong PCIe port in the BIOS rather than from anything XCP-ng was doing. He says the unknown header is what then produced the device or resource busy error on VM start, which is the error you opened with. I don't know whether your board exposes bifurcation the way his X10DRH-CT does, so it might not transfer at all. @kuznetcoff777 if that machine is still around, it'd be worth a look either way.