XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • J

      Not able to create new vdi with linstor at the moment

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XOSTOR
      5
      2
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      37 Views
      J
      OK so that resource was a pain and did not want to give up, so I restarted the host. Migration is running good now.
    • P

      RDNA 4 GPU Passthrough

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Compute
      26
      0 Votes
      26 Posts
      544 Views
      P
      @ravenet well... thanks for the idea. I went ahead and tried spinning up an opensuse slowroll VM. I installed docker and the amdgpu firmware/kernel drivers, and tried running lemonade-server and ollama and same behavior. So that definitely seems to point to something weird going on on my host rather than the guest software stack...
    • henri9813H

      Unable to live migrate VM between 2 local storages SR

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved XCP-ng
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      32 Views
      henri9813H
      Hello. Problem Solved. My case: i have a pool of many hypervisors with only local storage, no shared SR ( yes it's not recommanded, i stopped doing this and i'm currently migrating everything to pool with Shared storage ). Yesterday, i removed two hosts ( host 3 & host 4 ) whith local storages SR attached ( LVM ). In XCP-NG, i "forgot" Host 3 & host 4, the hosts from the pool, but it doesn't forge the associated SR ! But Live migrating a VM from host 1 to host 2 ( of the same pool ) bot with local SR, FAIL because there is no SR plugin attached of Local Storage 4 ( hosts 4 ) neither Local storage 3 ( host 3 ). So, i also forget theses 2 SRs and now it's ok. i don't understand why SR not connected to anyone can prevent migration about vm from other to other sr.
    • H

      Potential bug with Windows VM backup: "Body Timeout Error"

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      95
      3
      2 Votes
      95 Posts
      15k Views
      poddingueP
      Thanks for checking. That's useful, even if it points away from where I was looking. Clocks within a second of each other means drift probably isn't your problem, and I'd guess the MST/UTC difference is just how dom0 displays it, though I'm not sure. What I keep coming back to is that your full backups fail while the delta jobs on the same hosts never do. That's the same split in https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/issues/9181, where full backups hit BodyTimeoutError on VMs with big disks or a lot of free space and the deltas are fine. If your failing VMs look like that, your dates and the MST/UTC detail would do more good on that issue than buried in here. MajorP93 created this issue in vatesfr/xen-orchestra open Full backup fails on large VMs / VMs with lots of free disk space #9181
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      607
      1 Votes
      607 Posts
      371k Views
      rzrR
      XCP-ng 8.3 LTS Updated installer ISO The installer ISO has been refreshed with up date packages already published. The image can be downloaded from: https://repo.vates.tech/tmp/xcp-ng-8.3.0-20260709.testing.iso The procedure to install XCP-ng 8.3 remains the same. The refreshed installer ships updated Xen, Linux kernel and some drivers/firmware, which help with deploying XCP-ng 8.3 on hardware that needs changes introduced by updates not present in previous ISO image releases. This refreshed ISO has been validated on a subset of supported hardware. Additional testing on any hardware from the community would be greatly appreciated. As with previous installer releases, it can be used to upgrade XCP-ng from a previous major release (8.0, 8.1 or 8.2). Refer to the Upgrade documentation. For existing XCP-ng 8.3 installations, there’s no need to use this ISO image. Regular yum updates achieve the same results as a fresh installation with that ISO image. Installer improvements include minor enhancements related to software RAID1 support for the system disks, including support for more than 2 disks in the RAID1 array if anyone really wants that. New maintenance update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS This release batch includes a VBD leak regression fix in XAPI and minor changes needed to build the installer ISO. A regression was introduced to the VM.revert operation in xapi-26.1.4-3.3, which left VBDs attached to the VM when they are not present in the reverted-to snapshot (instead of destroying such VBDs, as was done before). VMs that were reverted to their snapshots after xapi-26.1.4-3.3 may have such "leftover" VBDs. Advanced users can use the leaked_vbds script to detect possible cases in your pools. Sadly, there is no way to automatically distinguish a VBD that was created after a VM.revert from a VBD that survived the VM.revert, so this script relies on the user to determine if the suspicious VBDs are indeed affected or not. What changed Control Plane xapi: Fix non-snapshotted VBDs staying attached after VM.revert Versions xapi: 26.1.11-1.2.xcpng8.3 -> 26.1.11-1.3.xcpng8.3 xcp-ng-release: 8.3.0-37 -> 8.3.0-38 Test on XCP-ng 8.3 yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates reboot The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc. What to test As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test. Test window before official release of the updates ~5 days We would like to thank users who shared feedback since our last call for testing: @Andrew, @XCP-ng-JustGreat, @acebmxer, @bufanda, @flakpyro , @marcoi.
    • P

      Error mirroring full backups to backblaze b2

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      18
      2
      0 Votes
      18 Posts
      1k Views
      P
      @florent Sorry, missed your previous post. I will return to master and test it (over the weekend). Thank you!