XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Home
    2. Popular
    Log in to post
    • All Time
    • Day
    • Week
    • Month
    • All Topics
    • New Topics
    • Watched Topics
    • Unreplied Topics

    • All categories
    • olivierlambertO

      🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Xen Orchestra
      212
      7 Votes
      212 Posts
      26k Views
      poddingueP
      @MajorP93: Thanks for expressing yourself regarding that, and I'll be transparent about the thinking behind it. Filing those on GitHub isn't me asking anyone to stop using the forum, quite the opposite in fact. The forum is where real conversations happen, and that's valuable in a way a GitHub issue never quite is. But forum threads scroll, get buried, and developers can't easily maintain a stable backlog out of them. GitHub gives the team a place where things don't disappear or get buried. Think of it as belt and suspenders (which I need now that I'm getting old ). The discussion lives here, the tracking lives there. My goal as community manager is to be the relay between the two, so you don't have to worry about it. File things here, talk about them here, and I'll make sure what matters makes it into the right repo. Or at least, that's the plan. Mine.
    • J

      Backups Fail with ENOENT: no such file or directory

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      6
      0 Votes
      6 Posts
      111 Views
      J
      @pierrebrunet I did try the "merge synchronously" option, but that didn't change anything. Can you expand on "your chains have an issue?" I understand the concept of chains, but in this particular case the situation is: Fresh install of XCP Brand new VM that has never been backed up before (though was built originally on another pool). There was no previously existing snapshot. New install of XO targeting a new NFS server with a ne backup job There shouldn't be any chain involved as literally everything is brand new. I cleaned up: Removed the snapshots from the VMs Unmounted the NFS Cleaned up the filesystem on NFS Remounted NFS Created a new backup job Left NFS with v4.2, enabled synchronous merge Restarted the job Same failure Some thing I noticed: When kicking off the job, the VHD appears in the NFS filesystem: /var/run/xo-server/mounts/d806298f-85cf-4565-bb7e-9fad479b941f/xo-vm-backups/e5f62657-8efb-3c2c-3397-2bfe01df5f0d/vdis/c82e4cd1-a0ee-4d7e-9e57-c77d8102593e# ls -alh 82c9959a-b4fa-46a1-a6ea-8cfbbeca864f/.1777916466905.20260504T174106Z.vhd In this example, this vhd file was 951mb. It remains there for about one minute, then disappeared. Shortly later the backup job fails, but I notice the snapshot remains, owned by control domain. That never seems to disappear. I think it's worth noting that I have imported several test VMs, as well as copied VMs cross-pool (from somewhere else to this pool) so it seems like the normal import/export mechanisms work properly. If you let me know what logs you'd like, I'm happy to upload them.
    • M

      Backup Job Fails with "timeout while getting the remote" - but Remote is Reachable

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Backup
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      52 Views
      M
      @florent Nothing has changed on the NFS (QNAP NAS) side; I had already been backing up to NFS before. It just stopped working over the weekend. What I did was commit changes to the master branch and update Ubuntu 24.04.
    • stormiS

      XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      493
      1 Votes
      493 Posts
      206k Views
      I
      Hello, I deleted the entire XOA and downloaded fresh image, recreated configuration and blank SR. The issue is gone. I will test some VDI migrations this week. There are is some performance impact and timeouts when creating 100-200 VMs on single 10 TB SR. I use xo-cli vm.create script. See you later
    • G

      auth-ldap (v0.10.11) - Specifying Multiple (Primary / Secondary) AD Servers under the URI field

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Advanced features
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      157 Views
      G
      @john.c This is a good idea as well. If the previous suggestion of trying to do a DNS round robin approach doesn't work, this may be my best option. Thanks for taking the time to provide your suggestion!
    • K

      RPU Failure on 8.3: Yum HTTPS 500 Error for xo-lite package (Hung Task)

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Management
      4
      2
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      101 Views
      K
      @julienXOvates Got it. I didn't get a chance to work on this over the weekend, so sometime this week, I'll just bounce the host and see if it comes back. Right now, while I can SSH into it, the admin console appears to be frozen and unresponsive (over iLO).
    • D

      XCP-ng 8.3 No Longer Compatible with Older Adaptec RAID Card?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      5
      1
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      256 Views
      Y
      @dkg Please also note that you should not use @jul1an ISO installer on production environment. Only on test env where you can afford to break things and lose data.
    • stormiS

      Second (and final) Release Candidate for QCOW2 image format support

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
      10
      5 Votes
      10 Posts
      942 Views
      pkgwP
      @stormi That is quite possible. I'll open a ticket for further investigation.
    • C

      Is v8.3 NUMA aware?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
      7
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      318 Views
      Y
      Hello @codemercenary In theory Xen is NUMA aware (See https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_on_NUMA_Machines) so you would leave memory interleaving option of the BIOS off so that Xen does what it thinks is necessary. But these kinds of settings are very very workload sensitive and in fact it's usually a good idea to just test what works best for you. Regards, Yann