XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    508 Posts 50 Posters 217.6k Views 69 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • marcoiM Offline
      marcoi
      last edited by

      anyone know if applying these two patches requires rebooting?
      948c0b37-14c7-4eb2-a7a4-2e3824c93417-image.jpeg

      M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • M Online
        manilx @marcoi
        last edited by

        @marcoi I've read in the blog post of Vates that no.
        Did it anyway.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • stormiS Offline
          stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
          last edited by

          Indeed, no reboot required if those are the only patches that you are applying, as indicated in the blog post.

          marcoiM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • marcoiM Offline
            marcoi @stormi
            last edited by

            @stormi I getting a response to reboot after applying to master.
            43aa846c-264e-4663-8624-4ce9908301ee-image.jpeg

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Online
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              XO isn't subtle and will ask for reboot regardless of the type of update (because for now there's no way to know if reboot is required)

              marcoiM A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • marcoiM Offline
                marcoi @olivierlambert
                last edited by

                @olivierlambert lol okay got it 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • I Online
                  IgorGlock
                  last edited by

                  Hello @dthenot
                  hello @danp

                  I got the results. You can access our lab, feel free, nothing is productive. Support ID: 40797

                  High count of VDI / VMs on single SR make entire Storage slow.
                  e36db14a-ddd3-4cac-b768-b7bc53b7278c-image.jpeg

                  Migration fails because of:
                  [21:52 xcp-ng-1 ~]# xe sr-scan uuid=43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962
                  Error code: SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_1200
                  Error parameters: , list index out of range,

                  59 Lines of log:

                  May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ['/sbin/lvchange', '-an', '/dev/VG_XenStorage-43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962/QCOW2-ffcf4c40-0d81-4da7-9908-478629c88358']
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   pread SUCCESS
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper acquired
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper sent '56171 - 832.417448266'
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ['/sbin/dmsetup', 'status', 'VG_XenStorage--43dbbe8e--039a--e66c--f6cb--d88de4f4d962-QCOW2--ffcf4c40--0d81--4da7--9908--478629c88358']
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   pread SUCCESS
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] lock: released /var/lock/sm/lvm-43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962/ffcf4c40-0d81-4da7-9908-478629c88358
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper acquired
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper sent '56171 - 832.433077125'
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ['/sbin/vgs', '--noheadings', '--nosuffix', '--units', 'b', 'VG_XenStorage-43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962']
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   pread SUCCESS
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper acquired
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper sent '56171 - 832.64258113'
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ['/sbin/vgs', '--readonly', 'VG_XenStorage-43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962']
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   pread SUCCESS
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 fairlock[8031]: /run/fairlock/devicemapper released
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] lock: released /var/lock/sm/43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962/sr
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ***** generic exception: sr_scan: EXCEPTION <class 'IndexError'>, list index out of range
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 113, in run
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return self._run_locked(sr)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 163, in _run_locked
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     rv = self._run(sr, target)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 377, in _run
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return sr.scan(self.params['sr_uuid'])
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMoHBASR", line 163, in scan
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     LVMSR.LVMSR.scan(self, sr_uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMSR.py", line 822, in scan
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     new_vdi = self.vdi(cbt_uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMoHBASR", line 230, in vdi
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return LVMoHBAVDI(self, uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/VDI.py", line 100, in __init__
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     self.load(uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMSR.py", line 1375, in load
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     size = int(self.sr.srcmd.params['args'][0])
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] ***** LVM over FC: EXCEPTION <class 'IndexError'>, list index out of range
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 392, in run
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     ret = cmd.run(sr)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 113, in run
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return self._run_locked(sr)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 163, in _run_locked
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     rv = self._run(sr, target)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 377, in _run
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return sr.scan(self.params['sr_uuid'])
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMoHBASR", line 163, in scan
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     LVMSR.LVMSR.scan(self, sr_uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMSR.py", line 822, in scan
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     new_vdi = self.vdi(cbt_uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMoHBASR", line 230, in vdi
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     return LVMoHBAVDI(self, uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/VDI.py", line 100, in __init__
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     self.load(uuid)
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]   File "/opt/xensource/sm/LVMSR.py", line 1375, in load
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]     size = int(self.sr.srcmd.params['args'][0])
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread]
May  8 21:40:34 xcp-ng-2 SM: [56171][MainThread] lock: closed /var/lock/sm/lvm-43dbbe8e-039a-e66c-f6cb-d88de4f4d962/030878c2-49fd-4b0f-a971-9dfa121249a3

                  Best regards

                  Igor

                  A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • A Online
                    Andrew Top contributor @olivierlambert
                    last edited by

                    @olivierlambert Seeing some failure/errors on CR jobs. It leaves VDIs attached to Control Domain... Next run it normally works. I have not seen this error until after the current sm update. Running XO (commit 7e144).

                                    "message": "INTERNAL_ERROR(Storage_error ([S(Illegal_transition); [[S(Activated);S(RO)];[S(Activated);S(RW)]]]))",
                "name": "XapiError",
                "stack": "XapiError: INTERNAL_ERROR(Storage_error ([S(Illegal_transition);[[S(Activated);S(RO)];[S(Activated);S(RW)]]]))\n    at XapiError.wrap (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/_XapiError.mjs:16:12)\n    at default (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/_getTaskResult.mjs:13:29)\n    at Xapi._addRecordToCache (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1078:24)\n    at file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1112:14\n    at Array.forEach (<anonymous>)\n    at Xapi._processEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1102:12)\n    at Xapi._watchEvents (file:///opt/xo/xo-builds/xen-orchestra-202605050700/packages/xen-api/index.mjs:1275:14)\n    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:104:5)"
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • stormiS Offline
                      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      Ping @Team-Storage

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • A Offline
                        anthoineb Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @IgorGlock
                        last edited by

                        Hello @igorglock, Damien is in holiday this week but he identified the issue and a patch should be tested for the next release of SM.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        • First post
                          Last post