🛰️ XO 6: dedicated thread for all your feedback!

[MajorP93]

@poddingue Hello, while I -as a user- appreciate that you coordinate these bug reports I do wonder: is the GitHub issues section of Xen Orchestra really the preferred way of reporting issues?
This is also a valuable information for me personally.
In the past I felt like issues at the XO github repository often did not get the level of attention by the developers compared to reporting the issues here on the forums.
I wrote some XO github issues in the past as well and noticed that some never got any response and/or update.
Reporting these things here on the forums mostly felt more "productive".
Looking forward to getting some insights in this regard.
Thanks and best regards

[poddingue]

@MajorP93: Thanks for expressing yourself regarding that, and I'll be transparent about the thinking behind it.

Filing those on GitHub isn't me asking anyone to stop using the forum, quite the opposite in fact.
The forum is where real conversations happen, and that's valuable in a way a GitHub issue never quite is. But forum threads scroll, get buried, and developers can't easily maintain a stable backlog out of them. GitHub gives the team a place where things don't disappear or get buried.

Think of it as belt and suspenders (which I need now that I'm getting old ). The discussion lives here, the tracking lives there. My goal as community manager is to be the relay between the two, so you don't have to worry about it.
File things here, talk about them here, and I'll make sure what matters makes it into the right repo.
Or at least, that's the plan. Mine.

[julienXOvates]

@acebmxer this should be fixed in the latest 6.4 release. Can you please confirm ?

[acebmxer]

@julienXOvates said:

@acebmxer this should be fixed in the latest 6.4 release. Can you please confirm ?

Could you provide more context? Which problem are you referring to?

Edit - Just updated home lab XOA to 6.4.1 no issues with v6 dashboard loading.

[julienXOvates]

@acebmxer https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/103160
no, that was about this:
"When creating vm in v6 and renaming the disk name. You can only enter 1 letter at a time. You have to keep clicking then typing the next letter. No other field has this issue."

[acebmxer]

@julienXOvates

Ok that was in xo from sources and yes issue is fixed...

Confirmed is working in XOA in 6.4.1

[colomb]

I really miss the description column XO5 has in the default/home view. I understand space is limited for the tree view, but maybe it could appear when a host is selected in the tree view?

[Pilow]

@colomb said:

it could appear when a host is selected in the tree view?

or as a tooltip when the cursor fly-over the name of th VM / host

[julienXOvates]

@colomb said:

I really miss the description column XO5 has in the default/home view. I understand space is limited for the tree view, but maybe it could appear when a host is selected in the tree view?

In XO6, you will see it if you click on the eye at the end of the row, then on the right panel.
Is this OK ?

[colomb]

@julienXOvates

@julienXOvates said:

@colomb said:

I really miss the description column XO5 has in the default/home view. I understand space is limited for the tree view, but maybe it could appear when a host is selected in the tree view?

In XO6, you will see it if you click on the eye at the end of the row, then on the right panel.
Is this OK ?

I noticed that. Unfortunately, for our use case, clicking on each vm to see the description is a little onerous. Ideally, you'd allow the user to customize the visible columns in the VMs page/tab. The fact that search includes description does help. Ultimately, it was convenient that XO5 would allow us to quickly identify vms by the description from the "Home" page.