XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Backup fails with "Body Timeout Error", "all targets have failed, step: writer.run()"

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Unsolved Backup
    105 Posts 20 Posters 12.4k Views 21 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • acebmxerA Offline
      acebmxer @JB
      last edited by

      @JB @gregbinsd @olivierlambert

      Yes restarting the tool stack works for me. I currently do not have any host offline at least not intentionally. If there is a network glitch that i am not aware of that might cause the issue if that is the actual cause.

      As @olivierlambert stated maybe we were having issues all along and they just changed something that is making the issue visible now. The support tunnel should still be open on my environment if you or the team want to look at logs.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • G Offline
        GregBinSD
        last edited by

        @jb
        @olivierlambert
        Oliver, you may be right, wondering whether they really worked. How can I prove that the metadata and xo-config backups were truly successful?

        Below, I pasted in the GUI backup log from XO5.

        425ae32e-ada6-4498-af93-eff3c5bb451a-image.jpeg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J Offline
          JB
          last edited by

          All my hosts are online, yet the error still occurs. However, if I restart, the backup works for two or three runs.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bogikornelB Offline
            bogikornel
            last edited by

            The problem is that my VM backups don't run either, because I still get a timeout. This morning out of 11 VM backups, 2 failed, on Tuesday 1 failed, 20 were good.

            P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierlambertO Offline
              olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
              last edited by

              5 minutes is clearly an HTTP timeout, the question is way we are reaching this timeout in the first place.

              christopher-petzelC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • P Offline
                pierrebrunet Vates 🪐 XO Team @bogikornel
                last edited by

                @bogikornel are you talking about another issue? We are on an issue specifically on "pool metadata backups". It seems you are talking about VM backups. If yes, can you send the backup log please?

                bogikornelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bogikornelB Offline
                  bogikornel @pierrebrunet
                  last edited by

                  @pierrebrunet This is the same error, but it occurs more often when saving metadata. I'm attaching the logfile. xo-backup-error-log.txt

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • C Offline
                    CodeMercenary
                    last edited by

                    This happens to me mostly with non-config backups but occasionally a config backup will fail. The VM that fails the backup with the body timeout changes around every day, then once a week or so, every VM will get backed up. It only happens on this XO instance and only with the full backups. It doesn't happen on another XO instance that performs delta backups of the same VMs a couple hours later.
                    0f04acef-0cd9-487c-8292-e27174bf9999-image.jpeg

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • christopher-petzelC Offline
                      christopher-petzel @olivierlambert
                      last edited by

                      @olivierlambert I feel like the cause of the timeout is what I posted here: https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/107454

                      The incidents of the errors in syslog correspond by matching pool, date and time to the incidents of errors in XO backup. I've traced through several of these incidents in the syslog and matched them to the errors in the XO metadata backup and matched these to missing metadata backup files in the directory on the storage server (ex. 20260807T041000Z) which is created even if the backup fails.

                      I would look in older logs to see if maybe this has been happening for a long time, possibly before an XO update now shows the error, but my syslog data only goes back 30 days. The XO metadata backup errors started over 30 days.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • olivierlambertO Offline
                        olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                        last edited by

                        I have a theory that I'd like you to test on a specific branch. It might be an Undici bug, but I'm far from being sure.

                        You need Node >=22.19 to make it work. Switch to the branch named fix_undici_paused_parser_crash, build it and try again.

                        christopher-petzelC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • christopher-petzelC Offline
                          christopher-petzel @olivierlambert
                          last edited by

                          @olivierlambert Good news. This morning, I built on the fix_undici_paused_parser_crash branch and manually ran the metadata backup job 10 times and did NOT get an error. Previously, running the job manually could result in the body timeout error, so we have progress.

                          I will stay on this build during this week, let the scheduled metadata backups run, and report back by this Friday.

                          M G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • M Offline
                            MajorP93 @christopher-petzel
                            last edited by MajorP93

                            @christopher-petzel Thank you for testing this! I am also interested in this fix since I encounter this issue from time to time. Unfortunately my testing environment / lab is currently unavailable which is why I wasn't able to compile & deploy this branch myself.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G Offline
                              GregBinSD @christopher-petzel
                              last edited by GregBinSD

                              @christopher-petzel
                              Great news!
                              I will test and report after it is available in a global update.
                              Thank you Christopher.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • christopher-petzelC Offline
                                christopher-petzel @olivierlambert
                                last edited by

                                @olivierlambert No metadata backup errors in the 4 scheduled backups since Monday, while on the fix_undici_paused_parser_crash branch. Previously, I would not have more that 1 day without an error. Between manual and scheduled backup jobs, I've not been able to recreate the error on this test branch.

                                This is good to see again...
                                6f8b9214-c5d9-4aef-abfa-b982dcccbe0b-image.jpeg

                                J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • olivierlambertO Offline
                                  olivierlambert Vates 🪐 Co-Founder CEO
                                  last edited by

                                  Excellent 🙂 so it was an undici bug after all… Now I'm making sure @Team-XO-Backend won't miss it 👍

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • J Offline
                                    JB @christopher-petzel
                                    last edited by

                                    @christopher-petzel Unfortunately, for me, it still has an error.

                                    7425c362-284f-41d1-8fc5-ce89cc4edf4f-image.jpeg

                                    commit c5fae

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M Offline
                                      MajorP93 @JB
                                      last edited by

                                      @JB Yes makes sense. You are not on the branch that already has the fix. Your commit is latest master branch.
                                      Either switch to the branch that got mentioned or wait for the fix to land in master.

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • J Offline
                                        JB @MajorP93
                                        last edited by

                                        @MajorP93 Ok. Thanks!

                                        P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • P Offline
                                          pierrebrunet Vates 🪐 XO Team @JB
                                          last edited by

                                          @JB @majorp93 We made a smaller PR to be merged just after the release (because it is linked to almost all XAPI calls), the new branch is this one if you want to test: fix_undici_timeout
                                          Same fix, just a little smaller 🙂

                                          christopher-petzelC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • christopher-petzelC Offline
                                            christopher-petzel @pierrebrunet
                                            last edited by

                                            @pierrebrunet I built on the fix_undici_timeout branch and manually ran the metadata backup job 10 times and did NOT get an error. I will stay on this build through the weekend, let the scheduled metadata backups run, and report back on Monday.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2

                                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                            Register Login
                                            • First post
                                              Last post