Subcategories

  • VMs, hosts, pools, networks and all other usual management tasks.

    473 Topics
    4k Posts
    olivierlambertO
    Hi, IP conflict?
  • ACLs, Self-service, Cloud-init, Load balancing...

    104 Topics
    863 Posts
    laszlobortelL
    @florent Thanks for your reply! We have started to migrate thousands of VMs, so disk transfer speed is important for us.. We will also do our detailed tests soon with different threads setting and publish it here. I think threads=1 is a good and logical default, but not efficient. Others might complain if you set it to a higher value. Configuration option would be a real good solution.
  • All XO backup features: full and incremental, replication, mirrors...

    511 Topics
    5k Posts
    itservicesI
    Evening @pierrebrunet My bad. I am now on commit b440f and the issue persist. I have written you a message with the link to the file. Regards, Marc
  • Everything related to Xen Orchestra's REST API

    86 Topics
    645 Posts
    J
    Hello I'm pulling stats for all VMs to understand CPU usage. We're a bit behind the curve in terms of XO versions, but these questions hopefully are still relevant. If using a granularity of days, the interval is set to 86400 (understandably) but the endTimestamp varies. Running this on June 9th @ ~1740 we get timestamps for both Mon Jun 8 01:00:00 AM BST 2026 and Tues Jun 9 01:00:00 AM BST 2026. Does this average across the day? Why is the timestamp 0100? Why would there be different timestamps between VMs (all are running) and does that mean that the figures are misaligned in the results? These are retrieved via curl and a bash script, a bit hacky, but for clarity the request is: ++ curl -X GET -s -H accept:application/json -b authenticationToken=[[REDACTED]] -o [[REDACTED]] 'https://[[REDACTED]]/rest/v0/vms/[[REDACTED]]/stats?granularity=days' Really keen to know if we can control the start and endtime, as well as provide a manual interval, as well as the aggregation strategy (min, max, average). Are any of these possible? Lastly, is cpuUsage the percentage as per the dashboard, but averaged over all CPUs? Thanks so much in advance. James
  • Terraform, Packer or any tool to do IaC

    51 Topics
    471 Posts
    poddingueP
    The Kubernetes CSI driver for Xen Orchestra just hit v0.4.0, and we want it on more real clusters before it reaches a stable release candidate. If you run Kubernetes on XCP-ng VMs, this is a good time to give it a proper workout. What's new in v0.4.0: Local-storage support Automatic pool-discovery fallback Kubernetes metadata now lives in Xen Orchestra VDI tags instead of the deprecated other_config. That change also drops the old requirement for Xen Orchestra 6.4 or newer, so the driver runs on more deployments now. ️ Read this before you upgrade. v0.4.0 is a breaking change. The Kubernetes metadata moved from other_config to VDI tags, so you must migrate before upgrading from v0.3.0. Do not upgrade in place: follow the v0.3.0 to v0.4.0 migration guide in the release notes, then move to v0.4.0. What helps us most is hearing how it behaves on your own setup: what works, what breaks, which storage backend you use, and which flavour of Kubernetes you run (k3s, full k8s, or something else). Edge cases on real clusters are the ones we don't see in our own testing. Where to report: start right here in this thread. It keeps everything visible to the community and lets others on the same setup jump in. If something turns out to be a reproducible bug, we'll move it to a GitHub issue on the repo so the team can track it to a fix. Release notes and migration guide: https://github.com/vatesfr/xenorchestra-csi-driver/releases/tag/v0.4.0
  • VMware import 404 error

    27
    0 Votes
    27 Posts
    6k Views
    S
    @florent
  • error when modifying backup metadata

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    622 Views
    julien-fJ
    @Gheppy It should be fixed, thanks for your report! https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/commit/b5578eadf7356098ac2fa4af63b75b18d34ba558 0 julien-f committed to vatesfr/xen-orchestra fix(xo-server/sr.{create,set}): name can be empty Fixes https://xcp-ng.org/forum/post/59937 Introduced by 65168c853
  • Continuous Replication on a large VM

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    J
    @Gheppy cool thanks. Good to see some real-world experience with a similar setup!
  • OpenId Login via Keycloak

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    3k Views
    julien-fJ
    @prononext @mandrav The problem of empty username has been fixed in master. The support of email for username field is currently in review in the PR linked in my previous message and will be available soon Thanks for your help!
  • USB Passthrough of licensing dongle

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    5k Views
    K
    I am using USB-servers from SEH and Silex. Both of them are working. Silex can provide higher Performance - SEH is IMHO nicer for license-dongels, etc.
  • XOA - Browse backups and filter by Remote

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    131 Views
    DarkbeldinD
    @KPS Hi, I don't think it's possible but I could be wrong perhaps an advance filter could do that.
  • 0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    julien-fJ
    @hannes Full backup interval (and Force full backup in the schedule settings) forces the job to do a full export of the disk and not a delta based on a previous one. It is not impacted by the retention as XO will always makes sure every chain has at least a full export at the beginning so that all backups are viable. Which means you will have multiple full backups, always one at the beginning, and, those that have been triggered by the settings above.
  • How to turn imported Windows VHD disk into VM?

    12
    3
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    3k Views
    J
    @rk9268vc sorry if this is too simple but I just went through this and had the same error in your screen shot.. .my problem was finding the correct uuid,, then my second problem was forgetting to change the VHD to vhd as the program I used left the letters in caps.
  • xcp having issues with dates for vms

    Solved date
    8
    1
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    1k Views
    D
    @julien-f thank you, much appreciated!
  • Multiple IP addresses on PIF via GUI

    Unsolved
    2
    1
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    728 Views
    AtaxyaNetworkA
    @luca-steinke Hi ! IPv6 is not (yet) supported in dom0, but it's a work in progress You can read more here: https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2021/02/09/ipv6-in-xcp-ng/
  • SR space occupied by backup snapshots

    18
    1
    0 Votes
    18 Posts
    2k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Okay let's continue by private chat on the partner thing.
  • Backup with local usb hdd attached - SR_OPERATION_NOT_SUPPORTED

    5
    2
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    @Gheppy Ah! Great news then
  • A "socket" was not created for HTTP request before 300000ms

    Solved
    90
    0 Votes
    90 Posts
    45k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Great news! Thanks @julien-f for the difficult investigation (it was hard to catch) and obviously everyone who helped to report and provide feedback. That's how we build software: together!
  • Replicating to same pool storage

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    582 Views
    planedropP
    @mauzilla I personally think having the CR job operate between 2 different pools is a better idea. I am curious though, are these servers located in the same physical location? If so why not try going with high availability instead of a CR job? https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/xenserver-and-vm-high-availability/ I haven't really done HA setups with XCP-ng before, so can't really speak to how good it is. But IMO CR and other backup jobs like that are more meant for geo replication and stuff like that (i.e. a disaster recovery scenario with some offsite XCP-ng host). Which is why I'm asking about location, personally don't see the benefit to CR if in the same physical location, I'd be more interested in HA at that point. This is just my two cents though.
  • RDP not working

    15
    1
    0 Votes
    15 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    @olivierlambert OK. Will have to find a working macos rdp client then. Will report.
  • Backup mergeWorker stuck

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    In general, it's easier to start on XOA (you can have a free trial with all features) to discover the ecosystem. Because XOA is more tested and also comes with an updater AND a way to give us access remotely to investigate a problem. So please deploy an XOA and report if it's better On which commit are you right now? Are you on the right version of node? (that's the questions you wouldn't have to answer if you were on XOA for example )
  • 0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Great news Enjoy!
  • Mandatory 2FA/OTP for login

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    3k Views
    W
    @olivierlambert Thank you very much Such prompt response.
  • "Error: self-signed certificate" OIDC

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    658 Views
    olivierlambertO
    Hi, This is an error regarding your certificates, which are self-signed. I'm afraid it's not related to XO itself. I suppose you can only use self signed certs in your context?
  • metadata backups suddenly failing

    Solved
    22
    1
    0 Votes
    22 Posts
    7k Views
    olivierlambertO
    Thank you @manilx and @Andrew for your feedback!