@L1512191 As @Danp said XO Lite is a Work In Progress, so while the functionality is shown, it's only displayed as coming soon. You can deploy the XOA Trial to get going (highly recommended) and immediately as soon as the Trial is working and your environment configured I'd recommend you deploy XOCE. The Trial is just that, a trial and good enough to get started. XOCE is an installation process that follows the from Sources documentation, and is a completely operable solution. You can check out my profile or just google "XOCE github".

@acebmxer I did install the certs, and everything went fine with that. But I never went back to try and install any uefi VMs through XO-Lite. Something I may or may not get back to, should really wipe the system and start fresh again to see how things have advanced. Things may be changing, and my lab may not have a physical place in my world. Which troubles me because I'll need to model things if this path turns into reality. Lots of unknowns right now.

@olivierlambert said in Limiting access to xo-lite to a specific IP address or ssubnet: About iptables, there's /etc/sysconfig/iptables but I'm not sure it's the right place to put manual modification, that's why I pinged the @Team-OS-Platform-Release In a way that's the right place, but one needs to be careful with modifications there.

@olivierlambert can you close this thread?

No. I'm saying that all VMs (HVM) are using RFB consoles, readable with VNC protocol (used by XO or a VNC client). There's no text console since it's like a screen in HVM. If you are stuck on "Loading in progress", it's not a console issue, it's a VM issue. You can use a LiveCD to check what's going on.

@olivierlambert I did reboot the system. The fact that I can access everything fine with the using the external url but not when I try to use the local IP address of the machine is strange. I'm at work currently but I'm going to do a deeper dive when I get home and search through everything in my home network. I just don't know what else to check.

Oh I see. Thanks for explanation

@Danp Yes I. have .. no change

@DustinB Hi Dustin, It's amazing what one can miss when setting something up, and I surely did miss that part. I now see much more in the way of management items. My project for the weekend will be XO/XOCE from source for my home rack. Thanks so much for seeing what I didn't. Take care, Eric

@Greg_E Having backup XO's has always been our policy here. @business we have our min XOA on a (now dedicated Intel server doing the backups, because of the EPYC networking issues) and then a XO (from sources) on the main pool if XOA tanks or during reboots. @home I hace one XO on each host. Has saved me time and time again.

@pdonias said in Wrong colours in dashboard: Thanks for the feedback, we'll take care of that. To get more of an idea about the HDR technology checkout these links:- https://www.viewsonic.com/library/photography/what-is-hdr-hdr-vs-sdr/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_dynamic_range https://www.dolby.com/technologies/dolby-vision/ Some of the links refer to videos though the graphics technology applies outside of videos, these will help you get an idea of how the technology will affect the user interface of XOA and XO Lite. In this case it's the colours part of HDR which is relevant as the user interface, doesn't have photos or videos in it but does still have other forms of imagery. Though the client devices may be used with other usage which the full HDR is appropriate for, so thus have compatible hardware and have the feature active. @ph7 If your interested in finding out more about HDR you can also check out the links above. I also added my input about your issue, as I knew that HDR can play a part in the reproduction of colour etc in an image, or user interface. So can have an impact on what colours are used on the dashboard, as well as other parts of the user interface.

Hi @mattnj I think it's possible deploy took some time and as long as you have a XAPI task running, remove can't be done Yes rebooting will "cancel" the task and destroy can work then

@tcorp8310 yes yum update should do the trick

Hi @Houbsi, good question. This is how it works: any XO instance that is connected to a pool will add some information about itself to the pool's metadata XO Lite reads that information to know the URL of XO's UI In xo-server's config, you can force XO to report a custom URL instead of raw network information: [http] publicUrl = 'http://example.com' However, at the moment, XO Lite doesn't support it, but it's coming soon: https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra/pull/7849 And @olivierlambert, yes, for now, any XO instance, whether it's an XOA or not, reports itself on the pool and we simply pick the latest one. But we can definitely implement something smarter in the future if necessary. pdonias opened this pull request in vatesfr/xen-orchestra closed feat(lite/XoaButton): support `xo-server`'s setting `http.publicUrl` #7849

@Tristis-Oris said in XOLite - Which URL?: @itpartner it already builtin at xen 8.3, so guide will not requried. This, XCP-ng 8.3 isn't released yet, so you're running 8.2 which doesn't include the package.

@hellst0rm I don't see why it wouldn't work as long as everything is set to trust your internal CA root. It's pretty trivial to create a CA. I did it years ago because I can't stand cert errors and as a learning exercise. The only annoying part is it's just one more thing to keep track of and update, but if you're running a homelab it just becomes another part of the exercise.

@borzel With my PWA manifest merged you can do further development work around it if you wish. However don't add to much extra Java script if you do so, as it can seriously affect performance and security. Also too many abstractions can affect the ability to understand how Xen Orchestra, as well as XCP-ng works and fix any issues, by thus limiting the number of people who can understand the code and its workings in order to fix them. As read any code from libraries and frameworks used in order to understand them and avoid any vulnerabilities in the code. Not to mention that people who wish to use it may not have Java script enabled browsers or have Java script disabled (maybe even blocked). If the software can't work at all without Java script in the browsers currently support available at the moment now, then they will boycott using the software or website.