XCP-ng
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XCP-ng 8.3 updates announcements and testing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    568 Posts 52 Posters 265.9k Views 75 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stormiS Offline
      stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @Andrew
      last edited by

      @Andrew We'll publish a fix for bind-utils, indeed, even if it's not part of the officially supported additional packages for XCP-ng, as it can be useful and we don't have strong reasons not to fix it.

      Regarding other packages affected by the openssl update, @rzr handled many of them as part of the OpenSSL update back then already, so now we'll mostly rely on reports such as yours in case we missed something which is actually used by the user community.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stormiS Offline
        stormi Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @rzr
        last edited by stormi

        @rzr said:

        Thank you again for feedback we will try to address reported issues on next batch (to come soon).

        Note that some issues are not related to this specific update batch, but might have been introduced on previous ones (TBC).

        Not knowing myself what it meant, I asked Philippe: it's about the nslookup issue. And potentially the issue reported by @ph7 but it's not clear to me yet if there was a problem with XCP-ng or Xen Orchestra.

        Anyway, basically this means that there's no known issue caused by this batch of updates, and that we'll keep addressing any relevant issue in the next updates if necessary, as usual.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • acebmxerA Offline
          acebmxer
          last edited by

          Applied patches at work. 3 pools updated with zero issues.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • marcoiM Offline
            marcoi
            last edited by

            latest patches, host1 /master patches went well and rebooted. moved vms over.
            host 2 in pool click on patch and it just sat there.
            976ce535-3ff7-4043-a054-d18d7358aa3c-image.jpeg
            i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.
            XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it. XO still showed host 2 need patches.
            I rebooted XO. host 2 shows patch, and task still remains in XO. Any idea how to clear it out from XO. or is it wait 24 hours kinds of thing?

            rzrR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • rzrR Offline
              rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @marcoi
              last edited by rzr

              @marcoi said:

              i ssh into the host2 yum clean metadata and yum update manually applied updates.

              Did you try to reboot it just after ?

              XO still showed host 2 needing patching, so i reboot it

              Seems not.

              What about rebooting the host too ?

              Let me pass the world to @Team-XO-Backend

              MathieuRAM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • MathieuRAM Offline
                MathieuRA Vates 🪐 XO Team @rzr
                last edited by

                Hi @rzr,
                When you say, "XO still showed host 2 needing patching", does that mean XO is still showing missing patches?

                If so, can you run the following command: xe host-call-plugin host-uuid=<uuid-host2> plugin=updater.py fn=check_update

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • marcoiM Offline
                  marcoi
                  last edited by

                  after i manually applied the patches, i used XO to reboot the host 2.
                  After the host 2 rebooted, XO still showed the task running and the host2 showed it needed to be patched. I rebooted XO and the task is still there ( been there for 13 hours now lol. ) but now host 2 shows patched

                  P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • P Offline
                    Pilow @marcoi
                    last edited by

                    @marcoi perhaps a restart toolstack would correct the phantom task ?
                    but at the end of patching of the master a restart toolstack should have happened already, automatically...

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • rzrR Offline
                      rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team
                      last edited by

                      New security update candidates for XCP-ng 8.3 LTS (kernel)

                      This release batch contains security fix on kernel, version update, some bug fixes and a few improvements.

                      What changed

                      Virtualization & System

                      • kernel: Fix Vulnerability: CVE-2026-46243

                        • Fixed the CIFSwitch security vulnerability that could allow privilege escalation from a user with low privileges.
                      • intel-microcode: Fix a hang on boot on some platforms (Revert Granite Rapids AP/SP ucode back to IPU 2026.1)

                      Drivers

                      • intel-ice: Update to 2.4.5
                        • Adds support for E825-C and E830.
                        • Adds support for Link Aggregation (LAG).
                        • Various stability, performance, and bug-fix updates.

                      Versions:

                      • intel-ice: 1.15.5-2.xcpng8.3 -> 2.4.5-8.1.1.xcpng8.3
                      • intel-microcode: 20260416-1.xcpng8.3 -> 20260416-2.xcpng8.3
                      • kernel: 4.19.19-8.0.46.5.xcpng8.3 -> 4.19.19-8.0.46.6.xcpng8.3

                      Test on XCP-ng 8.3

                      yum clean metadata --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      yum update --enablerepo=xcp-ng-testing,xcp-ng-candidates
                      reboot
                      

                      The usual update rules apply: pool coordinator first, etc.

                      What to test

                      As usual, normal use and anything else you want to test.

                      Test window before official release of the updates

                      ~3 days

                      We would like to thank users who reported feedback since our last call for testing:

                      @Andrew, @acebmxer, @flakpyro, @jeffberntsen, @majorp93, @marcoi, @ph7, @pilow, @probain.

                      acebmxerA A 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • acebmxerA Offline
                        acebmxer @rzr
                        last edited by acebmxer

                        @rzr

                        Installed updates on home lab. No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

                        [10:54 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# nslookup vates.com 8.8.8.8
                        Server:         8.8.8.8
                        Address:        8.8.8.8#53
                        
                        Non-authoritative answer:
                        Name:   vates.com
                        Address: 104.21.52.238
                        Name:   vates.com
                        Address: 172.67.205.118
                        
                        openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
                        #0 0x7f163cd960e7 in ??
                        #1 0x7f163cd9603a in ??
                        #2 0x7f163d9a3780 in ??
                        #3 0x7f163c1aedf6 in ??
                        #4 0x7f163c1f5464 in ??
                        #5 0x7f163c1f5732 in ??
                        #6 0x7f163c1f4b8d in ??
                        #7 0x7f163a95fbd9 in ??
                        #8 0x7f163a95fc27 in ??
                        #9 0x7f163a94844c in ??
                        #10 0x405818 in ??
                        Aborted (core dumped)
                        [12:50 xcp-ng-haznrrtw ~]# 
                        
                        F rzrR 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • F Offline
                          flakpyro @acebmxer
                          last edited by

                          Installed on my usual hosts, one of which has an E810 and used the ICE driver, no issues so far however i am not using LACP bonding on that host.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • rzrR Offline
                            rzr Vates 🪐 XCP-ng Team @acebmxer
                            last edited by rzr

                            @acebmxer said:

                            @rzr
                            No issues to report initially other then nslookup still an issue.

                            openssl_link.c:132: INSIST(dst__memory_pool != ((void *)0)) failed, back trace
                            

                            Yes I looked at it, it looks like it's a design isssue that was fixed in later version of bind.

                            In details If I understand correctly this patched version of nslookup is facing a SIGARBT caused by an assert on previously cleanup resources (dst__memory_pool) which is unexpected in finishing part of the openssl thread (dst__openssl_destroy).

                            This bind patched version (where ssl support is in progress) is also known to have memory leaks, but those are resolved in later version, so until we catch up you'll probably have to live with this little annoyance on process exit unless we find (and validate) a better fix.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A Offline
                              Andrew Top contributor @rzr
                              last edited by

                              @rzr Installed and running. Not expecting any issues because I'm not using SMB/CIFS, ice card, or CPU with affected microcode.

                              Rolling pool reboot failed me again... This time it got stuck evacuating a host with no VMs.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              • First post
                                Last post