@florent @mathieura XOA is giving alart about Memory running low.... I have not rebooted xoa or aything since @florent applied patchs to xoa. Support tunnel still open. [image: 1776189947547-screenshot-2026-04-14-140230.png]

perhaps "in the context of a proceeding RPU, do not start halted VMs" ? or "boot only halted VMs that have HA enabled" ? but I can imagine corner cases where this is not wanted. some chicken & egg problem.

@Pilow said: @ph7 try to put RETENTION to 1 in the schedule, as you are using LTR parameters I was running the shedule with 20 mins backup retention and it is running fine together with the LTR And here is the manual I ran at 14:56 removed [image: 1775140196713-screenshot-2026-04-02-at-16-28-13-backup.png]

@Andrew Yeah but XOA is still using it hence my interest in aligning my XO-CE instance with XOA as close as possible.

it's only possible to change management interface. [image: 1776174536719-d5cbdf34-9bd7-42fd-9866-6f7474550be7-image.jpeg] nothing can be done with other NICs. weird, what is this? [image: 1776174634577-5630d95a-79e5-421f-811c-1da5746b8812-image.jpeg]

@olivierlambert Can you provide insights? Is nested virtualization as in running Hyper-V inside a XCP-ng VM expected to work?

@flakpyro that's a good news ( but at least another user saw this) we are currently testing the branch ensuring that at least the fix don't create other issues

main.xxx (azazel.xxx) Snapshot Start: 2026-04-10 00:03 End: 2026-04-10 00:03 Local storage (137.41 GiB free - thin) - legion.xxx transfer Start: 2026-04-10 00:03 End: 2026-04-10 00:09 Duration: 6 minutes Size: 17.08 GiB Speed: 47.42 MiB/s Start: 2026-04-10 00:03 End: 2026-04-10 00:09 Duration: 6 minutes Start: 2026-04-10 00:03 End: 2026-04-10 00:09 Duration: 6 minutes Type: full

@AlexanderK The ronivay script requires you to select an option (#2 to update). I look at things this way, it's good to have more people working on scripts like this.

@TeddyAstie I hadn't seen anything special was needed in a VM other that a kernel new enough for support which 6.17 has, is there more to the story with adding things to Ubuntu?

@acebmxer Yes, 22 or 24 should work correctly. Some early versions of 24 had issues, but not currently. I'm running 24 and it is working.

I updated to branch "mra-fix-rest-memory-leak". I will look at backup job results tomorrow and report back.

@anthoinebThe problem still persists; when can we expect it to be resolved?

@florent I can confirm that this fixes the issue!

@gduperrey Worked swell, thanks

Found issue in my script all seems to be working now for me just no vmware vm to test import on

@Aleksander There are plenty of examples on this forum. We have used Nvidia T4, it works very well.

Hi @olivierlambert and @pilow Thank you for your answers, it helps a lot, Regards, Olivier

@TheNorthernLight Thanks for pointing that out, that totally makes sense, I should have realized to look it up that way. I guess I just think of XCP-ng as its own product so much that I forget it's based on Xen even though I know that.

@Pilow The backups kept by LTR are just regular backups with a specific tag, which doesn't change how we treat them. If you want to avoid each of your LTR backup to depend on one another, we recommend to set a full backup interval value to your backup job, which will regularly force a full backup. (even without LTR, having an infinite chain of backups can cause problem in the long term, especially if no healthchecks are made)